The decision affects three protected areas, where local communities have sought recognition of longstanding settlements, traditional rights and clarity over boundaries.
Ladakh Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena has rejected a report on the proposed boundaries of three protected areas, citing concerns over the legal process, ground mapping and national security. He has directed officials to settle the rights and claims of local communities in these areas within two months. The statutory process under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, for settling the rights of individuals and communities in proposed protected areas, had not been undertaken by the sub-committee, according to the LG’s office.
Saxena said the boundary delineation had instead been carried out through a “table-top exercise”, without following the legal framework prescribed under the Act. The administration said the exercise was inconsistent with the law, inequitable to affected communities and could face legal challenges.
Local communities have maintained that settlements and human habitations have existed in these areas for a long time and should fall outside the protected-area boundaries. The boundary issue also has a national-security dimension. It observed that mandatory defence considerations had not been duly factored into the report. Saxena also pointed out that the international boundaries shown in Survey of India maps had not been used as a reference while determining the limits of the protected areas.
The Board also observed that the preliminary notification issued by the erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir government in 1987 had not correctly mapped the protected-area boundaries on the ground.
The administration said these areas had been included in the earlier sub-committee’s exercise. The Board said several areas included in the sub-committee report are of strategic importance and relate to national security. The Board said this was essential for determining the boundaries of any protected area.
