Pointing out the discrepancies in the investigation, the court questioned how a fall

Pointing out the discrepancies in the investigation, the court questioned how a fall

The Bombay High Court has pulled up the Maharashtra government and the Mumbai police for the second straight day over the probe in the death case of Disha Salian – the former manager of actor Sushant Singh Rajput.

The Mumbai police had registered an Accidental Death Report (ADR) over Disha Salian’s death. Hire also cited the statement of Rohan Rai – who lived with Salian during the lockdown, noting that he was the first person to be interrogated and the closest to her well-being. The Public Prosecutor told the court that Salian’s father had made a statement on January 15, 2024, saying his daughter died by suicide due to financial depression and that the parents hold no complaints against anyone. Because the police mentioned his name, and there is no other connection to him in this case, his statement had also clarified that he only knows Aaditya Thackeray as a political figure.

The court immediately countered Hire, noting that it rained at 9:40 am – nearly six hours after the incident occurred.

after conducting an inquiry, claimed that she died by suicide, her father Satish Salian filed a petition in the High Court last year, alleging his daughter was gang raped and murdered While the police. Rai’s statement had mentioned that Disha had a dispute with her father, and the two had not spoken for three months before the incident.

The court then pointed out glaring inconsistencies regarding Salian’s clothes, saying that while the panchnama and post-mortem report stated that Salian’s body had no clothes, the photographs at the hospital and morgue showed the victim wearing clothes.

Pointing out the discrepancies in the investigation, the court questioned how a fall from the 14th floor could only break teeth. It also noted the missing bloodstains around her body and the patterns of injury.

“How did a fall from such a height not fracture the skull and only break the teeth?” the court questioned.